Index / case notes
Read the right before you make the image.
Each note isolates one consent or media-rights decision in EroLove AI's public policies. We have not generated, published or deleted a product image. The criticism follows the published clauses and states the limits of what they prove.
EroLove AI's Generated-Image License Is Broader Than Many Users Expect
A clause-by-clause reading of EroLove AI's perpetual image licence and the decision it creates before generating intimate media.
Read case note ↗FILE 02 / 2026-11-05Your Chat Is Private; Selected Character Images May Not Stay Private
Separate chat confidentiality, public character copies and deletion when assessing EroLove AI's image policy.
Read case note ↗FILE 03 / 2026-11-05EroLove AI Prohibits Real-Person Deepfakes: What the Ban Covers
A plain reading of EroLove AI's real-person likeness and impersonation ban, with a practical prompt boundary.
Read case note ↗FILE 04 / 2026-11-05Do Not Feed a Real Person's Intimate Details Into a Fictional Companion
A consent-oriented checklist for deciding what real-person details should stay out of an adult AI chat.
Read case note ↗FILE 05 / 2026-11-05Why ‘Fictional Adult’ Does Not End the Responsibility Conversation
A critical but fair framework for consent, audience and output rights around EroLove AI's fictional adults.
Read case note ↗Independent, unaffiliated criticism. We reviewed published policies; we did not generate images, inspect an account or verify enforcement.